More on the Fixed-term Parliaments Act

Philip Norton, a Conservative life peer and a Professor of Government at the University of Hull, provides his synopsis of the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act and why the Prime Minister of the UK no longer “calls” a snap election.

Incidentally, if our Senators were all even half as qualified as Norton, our upper chamber would be in much better shape today.

Unknown's avatar

About J.W.J. Bowden

My area of academic expertise lies in Canadian political institutions, especially the Crown, political executive, and conventions of Responsible Government; since 2011, I have made a valuable contribution to the scholarship by having been published and cited extensively. I’m also a contributing editor to the Dorchester Review and a member of the editorial board of the Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law.
This entry was posted in Dissolution, Electoral Reform. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to More on the Fixed-term Parliaments Act

  1. Rand Dyck's avatar Rand Dyck says:

    Thanks to you, we now understand the British dissolution process! But I think you shouldn’t throw the Senate into this discussion. If you remove all the hacks that Harper appointed and some of the earlier Liberal hacks, you are left with a pretty impressive group. Of course, they are having trouble sorting out their new life!

Leave a Reply