My Twin Books Become Available in January and February 2027


I finished editing the first proofs for my twin books in August and September, and the University of Toronto Press has now given them webpages as part of the Understanding Canada Series listing the names of the chapters in each. Better still on some level, the major retailers have bestowed upon me the title of “author”; Amazon now officially lists me as “James W.J. Bowden,” while Indigo merely lists me as “James Bowden” – but its Canadian seal of approval superimposed on the covers might compensate for striking out my splendidly pretentious double middle initials. Amazon remained more faithful to the books themselves than did Indigo in this regard.

Where to Draw the Line: Readjusting Federal Electoral Boundaries in Canada will come out on Tuesday, 26 January 2027, while Representation by Population in the House of Commons – which, despite the order of publication, I actually think of as the first of the two – will not join its twin until Tuesday, 9 February 2027. Seeing them under the banner of Irwin Law Publishing and the University of Toronto Press, as well as on pre-order in fine bookstores everywhere, now makes this all feels real to me in a way that it had not before.

Though only time will tell, I hope that Where to Draw the Line: Readjusting Federal Electoral Boundaries in Canada can serve as something of a sequel to John C. Courtney’s Commissioned Ridings: Designing Canada’s Electoral Districts, which came out in 2001 and therefore could only cover the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act up to the electoral readjustment of the 1990s. And I likewise envisioned Representation by Population in the House of Commons as a contemporary successor to the first few chapters of Norman Ward’s The Canadian House of Commons: Representation, which first appeared in 1950 and covered the history of the first two Representation Formulas.

Similar Posts: 

Posted in Electoral Boundaries Readjustments | 2 Comments

The Next Round of Federal By-Elections in 2026


The Liberals won all three by-elections held on 31 August 2026 with absolute majorities, despite only having held two of those three ridings beforehand; they therefore have gained one seat in the House of Commons. As of 1 September 2026, an additional five seats stand vacant, which will soon necessitate five more by-elections. While the House of Commons’ website lists five vacancies as of 1 September 2026, Elections Canada’s webpage on “Vacant Seats in the House of Commons Since the 2025 General Election” only lists four as of 1 September 2026, presumably because the Chief Electoral Officer has not yet received the Speaker’s warrant declaring that Conservative MP Cathey Wagantall has vacated the seat for Yorkton—Melville in Saskatchewan. Reports suggest that she did, however, formally resign, either on 31 August 2026 or 1 September 2026.[1] Larry Brock, the Conservative MP for Brantford—Brant South (which CBC News still deadnames as Brantford—Brant South—Six Nations, notwithstanding an Act to rename certain electoral districts, 2026) announced in August that he would also resign as an MP on 18 September 2026, three days for the House of Commons reconvenes in the fall.[2]

Continue reading →

Posted in Elections | Leave a comment

The Partial and Incomplete Metrication of Canada


A Presentation Comparing Metrication in Australia and Canada

One presentation at the Canadian Political Science Association’s annual conference at the University of Ottawa caught my attention as soon as the main conferenceprogram first went online. Patrick L. Desjardins of the University of Ottawa presented a paper cleverly entitled “Give Them an Inch, and They’ll Take 1.6093 Kilometers: Explaining Divergent Metrication Outcomes in Australia and Canada” at a panel just before mine on the afternoon of June 2nd. Funnily enough, attending this panel almost made me arrive late for my own, because the elevators in the Faculty of Social Sciences Building became bogged down in between each set of panels and almost impossible to use. I then rushed down the stairs – considerably better than trundling up them – to the ground floor where my panel took place.

Continue reading →

Posted in Commonwealth Realms, Comparative, History of British North America | Leave a comment

Restoring Michael Chong’s Original Reform Act


 

I thank Lydia Miljan, Professor of Political Science at the University of Windsor, for having invited me to contribute to her series Five Ways to Fix Canadian Democracy Without Constitutional Reform, which the Fraser Institute published on 30 June 2026. The self-explanatory title includes five such essays, to which I contributed on “Strengthening the Reform Act by Restoring Michael Chong’s Original Bill.”

Bowden, J.W.J. “Strengthening the Reform Act by Restoring Michael Chong’s Original Legislation.” Chapter 2 in Five Ways to Fix Canadian Democracy Without Constitutional Reform, edited by Lydia Miljan, 5-8. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute, 30 June 2026.

Continue reading →

Posted in Electing & Ousting Party Leaders, Party Discipline | 1 Comment

My Presentation on Malapportionment at the Canadian Political Science Association’s Conference in 2026


I presented an abridged history of malapportionment in the House of Commons at the Canadian Political Science Association’s annual conference on 2 June, which this year took place at the University of Ottawa. Ideally, one would like to go on at great length instead of only speaking for twelve minutes, but the necessities of brevity limited the presentation into a brief overview of the principle of representation by population, the true malapportionment of MPs per province each decade from the 1860s to the 2020s along the Loosemore-Hanby Index, the main features of each Representation Formula, and some basic methods through which Parliament could lower malapportionment in the 2030s. The discussant described my paper (a highly abridged version of the first five chapters of Representation by Population in the House of Commons) as reading more like a work of history rather than political science – which I readily admit and accept, either as criticism or as praise, given that I’ve never thought of myself as a conventional political scientist. Much to my pleasant surprise, my presentation on “Muddling through Malapportionment” generated some genuine interest during the questions and answers and even some praise from various other scholars after the panel.

Continue reading →

Posted in Electoral Boundaries Readjustments | Leave a comment