Category Archives: Indirect Amendment

My Latest Book Review in the Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law


The Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law just published my review of Donald F. Bur’s Laws of the Constitution Consolidated, by the University of Alberta Press. Similar Posts: Who Decides What the Constitution Is and Says? Quebec Modifies the Text of the Constitution Act, 1867 (June … Continue reading

Posted in Articles, Articles and Books, Constitution (Written), Indirect Amendment, Reviews | Leave a comment

Who Decides What the Constitution Is and Says? Quebec Modifies the Text of the Constitution Act, 1867


Introduction Law 96 has generated controversy and opposition amongst English-speakers in Quebec and, to a lesser extent, in the rest of Canada when the Legislature of Quebec enacted it last week for its provisions on language. But it contains one … Continue reading

Posted in Amending Formulas, Constitution (Written), Indirect Amendment | 2 Comments

More Tidbits On Indirect Amendment and Dissolution by Efflux of Time


If only I had discovered these little gems in time! Indirect Amendment The Commonwealth Law Bulletin will publish later this year my article “‘Indirect Amendment’: How the Federal Department of Justice Unilaterally Alters the Text of the Constitution of Canada.” … Continue reading

Posted in Amending Formulas, By Efflux of Time, Constitution (Written), Crown (Powers and Office), Dissolution, Indirect Amendment | Leave a comment

Taking Stock of 2018: Recent and Upcoming Publications


I’m pleased to report that the Commonwealth Law Bulletin has accepted and will publish at some point in 2019 my manuscript entitled “‘Indirect Amendment’: How the Federal Department of Justice Unilaterally Alters the Text of the Constitution of Canada.” This … Continue reading

Posted in Amending Formulas, Articles, By Efflux of Time, Constitution (Written), Indirect Amendment | 1 Comment

Who Updates Section 37 of the Constitution Act, 1867?


Whenever I re-read the Constitution Act, 1867 — the statute formerly known as the British North America Act, 1867 –, I always see something interesting which I hadn’t noticed before. I’m currently drafting a response to Professor Pilon’s strawman summary … Continue reading

Posted in Amending Formulas, Constitution (Written), Indirect Amendment | 3 Comments