The Speakership of the New Zealand House of Representatives


The Canadian Parliamentary Review has just published an article by the Speaker of the New Zealand House of Representatives, Lockwood Smith, which he based on a speech that delivered in 2010.

In “The Speakership: A New Zealand Perspective”, Smith reviews the history of the Speakership and Parliament and argues that Sir William Lenthal’s famous response to Charles I means that the Speaker as servant of the House means far more than simply acquiescing to the will of the majority. Smith sees the Speakership as a constitutional guardian and, in New Zealand, as the veritable Minister of the Parliamentary Service. Above all, the Speaker must facilitate the core function of the House of Representatives: to hold the Minister of the Crown to account for its expenditures.

 Of course the monarchy was restored in 1660 with Charles II followed by James II, but religious tensions saw Parliament at odds with the Crown until the glorious revolution in 1688 and the passage of the Bill of Rights Act. It was the start of the constitutional monarchy and, in 1690, the Commons took control over the Crown’s use of revenue as well as taxation.

Those crucial separations of power so fiercely fought for over hundreds of years, remain today and establish, to my mind, the breadth and depth of the Speaker’s role. The role is not just chairing or presiding over the House. It is, in its full context, about ensuring the House of Representatives is free and able to function effectively both as a legislature and in the vital role of holding the Crown or Executive to account. This view of the Speaker’s role guides my interpretation of Standing Orders and also my role as “Minister” responsible for the Parliamentary Service.

Lockwood Smith is a true parliamentarist.

Related Posts:

 

About J.W.J. Bowden

My area of academic expertise lies in Canadian political institutions, especially the Crown, political executive, and conventions of Responsible Government; since 2011, I have made a valuable contribution to the scholarship by having been published and cited extensively in my field. I’m also a contributing editor to the Dorchester Review and a member of the editorial board of the Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law.
This entry was posted in Articles and Books, Constitution (Conventional), Parliamentary Privilege, Reviews and Critiques and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Speakership of the New Zealand House of Representatives

  1. Pingback: What I Remember on the Fifth of November: The Glorious Revolution over Guy Fawkes | James W.J. Bowden's Blog

  2. Pingback: British Question Time Better Supports Parliament’s Core Function Than Canadian Question Period | Parliamentum, by James W.J. Bowden

  3. Pingback: A True Parliamentarist: The Speaker of the New Zealand House of Representatives Dr Lockwood Smith | Parliamentum, by James W.J. Bowden

I invite reasonable questions and comments; all others will be prorogued or dissolved.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s