Some Thoughts on Gerrymandering and Mid-Term Redistricting in the United States


Gerrymandering means that the party in power manipulates the boundaries of electoral districts to maximize the votes of its own supporters and dilute the votes of its opponents in an attempt to stay in office as long as possible. [1] This blended word comes from the combination of Governor Eldridge Gerry of Massachusetts and salamander; the original Gerrymander refers to the serpentine shape of one infamous congressional district that the legislature established in the 1810s to preserve a Democratic-Republic voting block and which Gerry signed into law.[2] Ideally, the electoral districts within a province would each contain roughly the same number of people within a narrow variance of the average number of people per MP, and these districts would also be established without regard to political party and would instead follow the general geographic contours of the province. Since single-member districts cannot by definition overlap with one another, the most mathematically “compact”, or perfect, electoral district has only four sides. In contrast, a gerrymandered district sprawls out into the squiggly lines of a pernicious polygon that cobbles together multiple pockets of support for one political party.[3] This pattern held for the first few decades after Confederation in Canada and still holds sway in many American states today.

Continue reading

Posted in Electoral Boundaries Readjustments | Leave a comment

Single-Member Electoral Districts Cannot Be Unconstitutional Because They Form Part of the Constitution of Canada


Introduction 

The Ontario Court of Appeal issued a ruling in August 2025 which upheld the constitutionality of single-member electoral districts and lambasted so-called “Fair Vote British Columbia” (which for some reason litigated single-member plurality in Ontario) for having “repackage[ed] failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.”[1] Justice Huscroft declared unambiguously: “The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter.”[2]

Continue reading

Posted in Amending Formulas, Constitution (Written), Electoral Boundaries Readjustments, Electoral Reform | Leave a comment

Mark Carney First Asked His Majesty the King to Deliver the Next Speech from the Throne Back in March, Says George Osbourne


George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer from 2010 to 2016, revealed on his podcast Political Currency on 29 May 2025 that Mark Carney had first asked His Majesty the King to open the 45th Parliament as King of Canada back on 17 March 2025. Osborne claimed that Carney had told him about all this directly during the same visit to London in mid-March 2025, shortly after his appointment as prime minister but before the dissolution of parliament for a general election. Osborne said in full:

Continue reading

Posted in Caretaker Convention & Government Formation, Constitutional Conventions, Crown (Powers and Office), Prime Minister's Powers | Leave a comment

Review of The Crisis of Canadian Democracy by Andrew Coyne


In The Crisis of Canadian Democracy, Andrew Coyne repeats the same refrain that has made the rounds for decades but presents his polemic as if it were original. His superficial assertions seem like profound arguments at first glance, and an inescapable implication weaves throughout his narrative: if only everyone thought as Andrew Coyne does, then so many of our problems would solve themselves. I risk giving Coyne too much attention and legitimacy by reviewing this book at all, but the bulk of this book merits a thorough refutation because he seems to have garnered such a following, especially from the credulous at The Hub, The Agenda with Steve Paikin, and the Monk Centre.

Continue reading

Posted in Articles and Books, Reviews | 1 Comment

Updates on the Reform Act and Fixed-Date Elections


Nova Scotia Shows a Better Way

In February, I outlined a government bill tabled by Tim Houston, Premier of Nova Scotia, which contained a line to repeal the province’s fixed-date elections law, amongst other things. The omnibus Government Organization and Administration Act received Royal Assent on 26 March 2025, and thus makes Nova Scotia both the last province to have adopted a fixed-date elections law and the first province to have repealed it outright.

Continue reading

Posted in Electing & Ousting Party Leaders, Fixed-Date Elections, Party Discipline | Leave a comment