Premier Wab Kinew Wants to Make Manitoba the Second Officially Bilingual Province


 

“A Truly Bilingual Province” 

Radio-Canada reported on 3 October 2025 that Wab Kinew, the Premier of Manitoba, would to see his province become bilingual “like New Brunswick.” Radio-Canada Info uploaded this video to its website and YouTube channel which contains excerpts of a longer interview that Kinew gave to Radio-Canada’s Le 6 à 9 on 2 October.[1] Radio-Canada Info published an accompanying article and took some snippets of the longer interview where Kinew said:

« Si on pourrait dire, “Oui, il y a aussi une province bilingue à l’ouest,” ben, le Canada c’est peut-être à un autre niveau dans la francophonie mondiale. »  […] « Notre bilinguisme n’est pas juste une étape symbolique. »

In English, Kinew’s statement translates as follows:

“If we could say, ‘yes, there is also a bilingual province out West,’ well, Canada would perhaps be at another level in the French-speaking world.” […] “Our bilingualism is not just a symbolic step.”

The full interview on Le 6 à 9 from 2 October went for 10 minutes and 30 seconds in total; the first half covered other issues like healthcare and decorum in politics in the 2020s, but from around 6 minutes 15 seconds to 10 minutes 30 seconds, the host asked the Premier about some recent public consultations on bilingualism in Manitoba and what official bilingualism means in his estimation. Kinew mentioned that he would like Manitoba to become a member of the Organisation internationale de la francophonie as New Brunswick and Quebec are as provinces, in addition to Canada as a whole. He then said that he wanted to recognise bilingualism “in our laws, like in New Brunswick, which is truly bilingual” – which presumably means some kind of constitutional amendment, given that Manitoba’s laws are already published in both languages and given that Manitoba’s legislature enacted a law in 2016 to promote French in Manitoba. Kinew also brought up “the question of services and being capable of providing access to services in the French language so that bilingualism is not just a symbolic step;” he further described education and access to healthcare in French as “the greatest challenge” and “perhaps there is more to do there.”

When the interview asked what “becoming official bilingual, like New Brunswick in the letter of the law, would do concretely for French-speakers” and “what it would change,” Kinew replied that such a policy would install Franco-Manitobans with “pride”, improve “the quality of services delivered by the government,” and expand French-speaking Canada out West. Kinew concluded that his government could make Manitoba a member-state of the Francophonie within “a few years” but that “this larger project of becoming a bilingual province in law would be a process a bit longer than that.”

Continue reading

Posted in Amending Formulas, Constitution (Written), History of British North America | Leave a comment

Some Thoughts on Gerrymandering and Mid-Term Redistricting in the United States


Gerrymandering means that the party in power manipulates the boundaries of electoral districts to maximize the votes of its own supporters and dilute the votes of its opponents in an attempt to stay in office as long as possible. [1] This blended word comes from the combination of Governor Eldridge Gerry of Massachusetts and salamander; the original Gerrymander refers to the serpentine shape of one infamous congressional district that the legislature established in the 1810s to preserve a Democratic-Republic voting block and which Gerry signed into law.[2] Ideally, the electoral districts within a province would each contain roughly the same number of people within a narrow variance of the average number of people per MP, and these districts would also be established without regard to political party and would instead follow the general geographic contours of the province. Since single-member districts cannot by definition overlap with one another, the most mathematically “compact”, or perfect, electoral district has only four sides. In contrast, a gerrymandered district sprawls out into the squiggly lines of a pernicious polygon that cobbles together multiple pockets of support for one political party.[3] This pattern held for the first few decades after Confederation in Canada and still holds sway in many American states today.

Continue reading

Posted in Electoral Boundaries Readjustments | Leave a comment

Single-Member Electoral Districts Cannot Be Unconstitutional Because They Form Part of the Constitution of Canada


Introduction 

The Ontario Court of Appeal issued a ruling in August 2025 which upheld the constitutionality of single-member electoral districts and lambasted so-called “Fair Vote British Columbia” (which for some reason litigated single-member plurality in Ontario) for having “repackage[ed] failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.”[1] Justice Huscroft declared unambiguously: “The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter.”[2]

Continue reading

Posted in Amending Formulas, Constitution (Written), Electoral Boundaries Readjustments, Electoral Reform | Leave a comment

Mark Carney First Asked His Majesty the King to Deliver the Next Speech from the Throne Back in March, Says George Osbourne


George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer from 2010 to 2016, revealed on his podcast Political Currency on 29 May 2025 that Mark Carney had first asked His Majesty the King to open the 45th Parliament as King of Canada back on 17 March 2025. Osborne claimed that Carney had told him about all this directly during the same visit to London in mid-March 2025, shortly after his appointment as prime minister but before the dissolution of parliament for a general election. Osborne said in full:

Continue reading

Posted in Caretaker Convention & Government Formation, Constitutional Conventions, Crown (Powers and Office), Prime Minister's Powers | Leave a comment

Review of The Crisis of Canadian Democracy by Andrew Coyne


In The Crisis of Canadian Democracy, Andrew Coyne repeats the same refrain that has made the rounds for decades but presents his polemic as if it were original. His superficial assertions seem like profound arguments at first glance, and an inescapable implication weaves throughout his narrative: if only everyone thought as Andrew Coyne does, then so many of our problems would solve themselves. I risk giving Coyne too much attention and legitimacy by reviewing this book at all, but the bulk of this book merits a thorough refutation because he seems to have garnered such a following, especially from the credulous at The Hub, The Agenda with Steve Paikin, and the Monk Centre.

Continue reading

Posted in Articles and Books, Reviews | 1 Comment