<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for James W.J. Bowden&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parliamentum.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parliamentum.org</link>
	<description>&#039;To the liberalism they profess, I prefer the liberties we enjoy; to the Rights of Man, the rights of Englishmen.&#039; -- Benjamin Disraeli</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;In Vogue to Prorogue?&#8221; CBC&#8217;s At-Issue Panel on Prorogation by many women who own vintage dresses save their favorite pieces to pass on to thei</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/2012/10/20/in-vogue-to-prorogue/#comment-7571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[many women who own vintage dresses save their favorite pieces to pass on to thei]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?p=2018#comment-7571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey! Someone in my Facebook group shared this website with us so I came to take a look. I&#039;m definitely loving the information. I&#039;m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Great blog and excellent style and design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Someone in my Facebook group shared this website with us so I came to take a look. I&#8217;m definitely loving the information. I&#8217;m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Great blog and excellent style and design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Decorum in the Australian House of Representatives by rxiaqiangk</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/2011/10/03/decorum-in-the-australian-house-of-representatives/#comment-7539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rxiaqiangk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 21:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?p=370#comment-7539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[justin bieber fans loves goods,welcome to view it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>justin bieber fans loves goods,welcome to view it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Curriculum Vitae by Mark Ruttan</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/about/curriculum-vitae/#comment-7527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ruttan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 20:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?page_id=1874#comment-7527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James, I have enjoyed reading your blogs. I have a question for you. Has the Governor General ever refused to grant royal assent to a Bill?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I have enjoyed reading your blogs. I have a question for you. Has the Governor General ever refused to grant royal assent to a Bill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Constitutional Crisis in Papua New Guinea: Codification Causes Confusion by Adam</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/2011/12/21/constitutional-crisis-in-papua-new-guinea-codification-causes-confusion/#comment-7413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?p=1073#comment-7413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what do you think of s.59 in the 1999 proposed Australian republic amendment Bill whereby there would only be reference to the constitutional conventions instead of codification. Do you think that this would have been an effective way of clarifying the executive in Australia?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what do you think of s.59 in the 1999 proposed Australian republic amendment Bill whereby there would only be reference to the constitutional conventions instead of codification. Do you think that this would have been an effective way of clarifying the executive in Australia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Her Majesty&#8217;s Loyal Opposition by curacao mambo beach</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/2011/08/27/her-majestys-loyal-opposition/#comment-7395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[curacao mambo beach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 08:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?p=334#comment-7395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the valuable info you provide for your articles. I&#039;ll bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I&#039;m 
rather certain I will learn a lot of new stuff proper right 
here! Best of luck for the next!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the valuable info you provide for your articles. I&#8217;ll bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I&#8217;m<br />
rather certain I will learn a lot of new stuff proper right<br />
here! Best of luck for the next!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prorogation As Prime Ministerial Delay Tactic: A Legitimate Parliamentary Tool, Not &#8220;Abuse&#8221; of Prerogative by mesa golf swing</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/2011/08/29/prorogation-as-prime-ministerial-delay-tactic/#comment-7342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mesa golf swing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?p=350#comment-7342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantastic goods from you, man. I&#039;ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just too magnificent. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you&#039;re stating and the way in which you 
say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it wise.
I cant wait to read far more from you. This is really a great website.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic goods from you, man. I&#8217;ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just too magnificent. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you&#8217;re stating and the way in which you<br />
say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it wise.<br />
I cant wait to read far more from you. This is really a great website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Neither the Queen Nor the Governor General Can Dissolve Parliament Unilaterally! by A Prorogation Similar in Principle &#124; James W.J. Bowden&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/2012/04/12/no-unilateral-dissolution/#comment-7100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Prorogation Similar in Principle &#124; James W.J. Bowden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?p=1515#comment-7100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Neither the Queen Nor the Governor General May Dissolve Parliament Unilaterally [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neither the Queen Nor the Governor General May Dissolve Parliament Unilaterally [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prorogation As Prime Ministerial Delay Tactic: A Legitimate Parliamentary Tool, Not &#8220;Abuse&#8221; of Prerogative by A Prorogation Similar in Principle &#124; James W.J. Bowden&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/2011/08/29/prorogation-as-prime-ministerial-delay-tactic/#comment-7099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Prorogation Similar in Principle &#124; James W.J. Bowden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?p=350#comment-7099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Prorogation as a Prime Ministerial Delay Tactic: A Legitimate Parliamentary Tool, Not “Abuse of Po... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prorogation as a Prime Ministerial Delay Tactic: A Legitimate Parliamentary Tool, Not “Abuse of Po&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peter Russell on the Prorogation-Coalition Controversy of 2008 by A Prorogation Similar in Principle &#124; James W.J. Bowden&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/2012/06/25/peter-russell-on-the-prorogation-coalition-controversy-of-2008/#comment-7098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Prorogation Similar in Principle &#124; James W.J. Bowden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?p=1827#comment-7098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Peter Russell on the Prorogation-Coalition Controversy of 2008 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Peter Russell on the Prorogation-Coalition Controversy of 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prorogation Should Remain a Prime Ministerial Power by A Prorogation Similar in Principle &#124; James W.J. Bowden&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://parliamentum.org/2012/07/02/prorogation-should-remain-a-prime-ministerial-power/#comment-7097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Prorogation Similar in Principle &#124; James W.J. Bowden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentum.org/?p=1859#comment-7097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Prorogation Should Remain a Prime Ministerial Power [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prorogation Should Remain a Prime Ministerial Power [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
