Parliamentum's Popularity
- 51,512 hits
Posts By Subject
- Constitution (Conventional)
- Constitution (Written)
- Crown (Powers and Office)
- History of British North America
- Loyal Opposition
- Monarchism v Republicanism
- Parliament
- Parliamentarism v Presidentialism
- Political Parties
- Reform
- Responsible Government
- Reviews and Critiques
- The Personal Union
- Uncategorized
- Whigs v Tories
Posts By Month
Blogroll
Tags by Subject
Andrew Coyne Anne Twomey Balanced Constitution bipartisanship Charles I Christopher Moore coalition government Dalton McGuinty David Starkey Democratizing the Constitution dissolution Duff Conacher English Bill of Rights Eugene Forsey First Federal Republic of Canada identity politics inter-institutional opposition intra-institutional opposition James I James II Jean Chretien John A. Macdonald Letters Patent 1947 liberal-constitutionalism Lord Dufferin Manual of Official Procedure of the Government of Canada Michael Bliss Nicholas A. MacDonald Patriation Reference Paul Benoit Peter Russell Philippe Lagassé prorogation Robert Macgregor Dawson Romanticism royal infallibility s.41(a) Sir John George Bourinot Statute of Westminister Stephen Harper The Glorious Revolution Vernon Bogdanor Walter Bagehot William III Your Canada Your Constitution
Category Archives: Conferences and Speeches
Your Canada, Your Constitution: Constitutional Sophistry and Political Activism Trump Scholarly Research and Educating Canadians
Introduction: The Mendacity of Your Canada, Your Constitution Your Canada, Your Constitution (YCYC) has published three other media releases since its formal launch on 4 June 2012; they all demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that this organization actively promotes constitutional sophistry … Continue reading
Posted in Conferences and Speeches, Crown (Powers and Office), Governor's Discretion, Reviews and Critiques, The Personal Union, YCYC Watch
Tagged Andrew Cohen, Australian Cabinet Handbook, British Cabinet Manual, Carl Turkstra, Christopher Moore, Democratizing the Constitution, Duff Conacher, First Federal Republic of Canada, Manual of Official Procedure of the Government of Canada, Michael Bliss, Nathan Tidridge, New Zealand Cabinet Manual, Nicholas A. MacDonald, Patriation Reference, Romanticism, Royal Assent, s.41(a), Secession Reference, Your Canada Your Constitution
8 Comments
Contrarian for the Crown Infiltrates the Launch of Your Canada, Your Constitution
Introduction I am pleased to have been given the opportunity to present at the launch of a new charity called “Your Canada, Your Constitution” here in Ottawa on 4 June 2012. I consider myself a good writer but a poor … Continue reading
Posted in Conferences and Speeches, Constitution (Written), Monarchism v Republicanism, Reviews and Critiques, YCYC Watch
Tagged A.V. Dicey, Andrew Cohen, Carl Turkstra, Christopher Moore, constitutional sophistry, Duff Conacher, First Federal Republic of Canada, George Orwell, liberal-constitutionalism, Michael Bliss, monarchical succession, s.41(a), Your Canada Your Constitution
6 Comments
The Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s Debate on Prime Ministerial Power: Andrew Coyne vs. Sheila Copps
Introduction On 10 May 2012, the Macdonald-Laurier Institute held a debate on “Power Corrupts Canadian Prime Minister”, the fourth instalment of its History Wars series. Theoretically, Andrew Coyne argued in favour of the resolution and therefore against prime ministerial power, … Continue reading
Posted in Conferences and Speeches, Confidence Convention, Constructive Non-Confidence, Crown (Powers and Office), Prime Minister's Powers, Reform
Tagged Andrew Coyne, Canadian Study of Parliament Group, checks & balances, dissolution, J.L. Granastein, Jean Chretien, Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Peter Hennessy, Peter Russell, prorogation, s.41(a), Shelia Copps, Tainted Blood Scandal
Leave a comment
The Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s Debate on the Crown: John Fraser vs. Michael Bliss
Introduction The Macdonald-Laurier Institute held a debate on the Crown on 14 March 2012 on the resolution that “The monarchy is a dangerous anachronism”. John Fraser opposed it, and Michael Bliss supported it. The erstwhile republican Jack Granastein presided over … Continue reading
